Wednesday, January 2, 2013

On Primary Education


I am biased. Whenever I see any problem outside I blame it on Primary Education. The activist in me crave for a better education system and curses for the education I have had. And whenever I go deep into my helplessness about all that is happening around I get back to my romanticism of being a school teacher..
With reference from Prof Anil Sadgopalan’s lecture on youtube titled Nai Taleem, he mentioned that current education system is based upon Lord Macaulay’s draft proposed in way back 1835. It majorly underlies following points:
  •  Dialects in India are so poor that worldly knowledge can’t be told with those
  •  Alone Europe’s books are more knowledgeable than rest of the world’s books
  •   Nobody can progress alone with mother-tongue. Propagation of English is therefore necessary
  •   With India’s restricted resources it’s not possible to impart education to all

Jyotirao Phule, who is considered to be pioneers in imparting primary education to women and oppressed classes in 19th century addressed to Hunter Commission in 1882 putting forward following points:
  •  Government collects revenues from poor workers however it spends those on upper caste and class people
  • Primary education is not good; not useful and not vocationally oriented. Entire machinery is driving to giving jobs. System requires complete change. We want teachers who will hold ploughs in their hand; should have capability to link/befriend oppressed classes. Curriculum to be adjoined with agriculture and skill-oriented options.
  • We just don’t want primary education but higher education as well. No nation can move ahead without higher education. Whatever is required in primary education for a skilled teacher comes through higher education.

He vehemently proposed that thoughts and ideas of education in India are imported from Oxford and Cambridge. British were looking forward for creating a clan which would work in British’s various government offices and factories (the mentality which still prevails!) Farmers’ next generation do not want to get back to farming!
Kal- Aaaj aur Kal.. Nothing much has changed since last 200 odd years. Many activist educationists claim that we are continuing Macaulay’s agenda in school system, like the revenue system. To start with the language in school used is state language (Marathi, Tamil, Malayalam, Hindi etc.  In central India its mostly hindi). However when I see around in tribal dominated regions, people prefer expressing themselves in their tribal dialect. If teachers are not well-versed with local linguae franca, then language of communication becomes hindi. In such attempts of mainstreaming tribals, they are losing their dialects - a culture is getting wiped away slowly. Statewide variation of languages as means of communication in schools should have to be there.
As said above by Jyotirao Phule way back in 1885 has not been pondered over and acted upon. The rural youths who are getting educated in mainstream systems are loosing their touch with soil. There are not enough opportunities available for government and private jobs. There is limit to which they can start their own businesses in rural areas. However there are enough opportunities in agriculture. If the agriculture is done scientifically then India can achieve several fold increase in current agriculture growth of 2 -2.5 %. Agriculture and allied agriculture (Fishery, Horticulture, Piggery etc. ) should have to be a subjects in rural India. Government can create several lakhs new ‘jobs’ by making next generation as proud farmers!
Above point also leads to another very crucial point missed by our country which is ‘rural dominated’. The syllabus for both urban and rural India is same within a state – whereas the livelihood opportunities sought by both the sections is very different. No doubt that even rural people should have opportunities for best education but additionally they should have options to pursue other vocational options. Probably developmental assumption behind these attempts that Development of rural areas for us means Urbanisation! We should with immediate effect have different syllabus for both urban and rural India.
With recent rape and murder of Amanat in delhi, Gender Sensitization forums should begin from schools itself. Our sociological formation has gone seriously wrong by our patriarchal mindset. This should be urgently dealt by us across various layers beginning it from Primary School.
Most of the schools in villages do not have science labs. They are taught sciences without practicals. In this case science becomes a theory for pupils –  authority written in books which has to be followed.
Recently temporary teachers in Chhattisgarh had gone on strike to increase their salary and make them permanent. Majority of teachers in CG are temporary with salaries meager as 8000-12000 – 25% to 30% of their same experienced permanent teachers.  Schools are crucial for nation building – as they prepare generations to face the challenges of the world. Teachers and their satisfaction are crucial for it to succeed. If they are not fulfilled, how would they teach students? Are our rest of the expenditures are so important that we can’t divert our fund to teachers’ salaries.
Let’s see what J. Krishnamurti says who has written extensively on Education and went on to found schools like Rishi Valley.
The Function of Education
Don't you notice how little energy most of the people around you have, including your parents and teachers? They are slowly dying, even when their bodies are not yet old. Why? Because they have been beaten into submission by society. You see, without understanding its fundamental purpose which is to find extraordinary thing called the mind, which has the capacity to create atomic submarines and jet planes, which can write the most amazing poetry and prose, which can make the world so beautiful and also destroy the world - without understanding its fundamental purpose, which is to find truth or God, this energy becomes destructive; and then society says, "We must shape and control the energy of the individual." So, it seems to me that the function of education is to bring about a release of energy in the pursuit of goodness, truth, or God, which in turn makes the individual a true human being and therefore the right kind of citizen. But mere discipline, without full comprehension of all this, has no meaning, it is a most destructive thing. Unless each one of you is so educated that, when you leave school and go out into the world, you are full of vitality and intelligence, full of abounding energy to find out what is true, you will merely be absorbed by society; you will be smothered, destroyed, miserably unhappy for the rest of your life. As a river creates the banks which hold it, so the energy which seeks truth creates its own discipline without any form of imposition; and as the river finds the sea, so that energy finds its own freedom. 
J. Krishnamurti
Think On These Things, Chapter 24
In USA, during emergency wartime all the civilians have to join military even for a short time. Aren’t we are living in emergency where more than half of our population is barely literate? Why not working in villages as teachers in rural areas should be made mandatory for each graduate. It would not only enhance the quality of education but would also sensitise civilians to be better citizens. What if government proliferate private participation in primary education as it has greatly facilitated in higher technical education. If NGOs run some schools in rural India. CSR take charge of some of schools in rural areas. We need to be more creative since we have limited financial resources instead of compromising on the quality of education.
We need to act with alarmring urgency and immediate effect, as many things are seriously goofed up around us. Doesn’t that disturb me?

journey from i to my natural self, me..

Followers